Surgery is still the cornerstone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, only 5% to 20% of all pancreatic cancers can be resected radically on diagnosis. The type of surgery depends on the affected location in the pancreas, the size of the tumour, and the need to obtain resection margins free of disease. Therefore, while in some cases the preservation of the pancreas is possible (duodenum-cephalo-pancreatectomy, distal splenic-pancreatectomy), in other cases the pancreatic gland must be completely removed (total pancreatectomy) with resulting pancreatic insufficiency, and diabetes mellitus.
For a possible resection surgery, it is fundamental to contact centres of reference, where perioperative morbidity and mortality are reduced to a minimum. This depends on one hand on expertise and experience of a high number of cases operated; and on the other, the expertise of different professionals working in harmony with one another (surgical oncologist, medical oncologist, radiologist, gastroenterologist, endoscopist, interventional radiologist, pathologist, nutritionist, endocrinologist). All these professionals have been at IEO since its foundation and they collaborate actively in the optimisation of diagnosis and treatment patterns of this form of cancer.
Advances in technology, techniques, and minimally-invasive surgical instruments have encouraged the application of the minimally-invasive laparoscopic approach to the treatment of pancreatic malignancies. Procedures such as laparoscopic staging and remote pancreatectomy have proven feasible and safe and appear to offer significant advantages compared to their corresponding surgeries performed by laparotomic access.
The effects on nutritional status and overall patient health due to the absence of the pancreas are effectively prevented through recommendations and personalised diet plans, provided by specialised personnel at the time of hospital discharge and during successive follow-ups. Possible metabolism alterations, including diabetes mellitus, are properly evaluated and promptly corrected with the support of endocrinologists. Both professionals are present at IEO and are an important resource for the overall management of the patient.
Adjuvant chemotherapy, aimed at preventing tumour recurrence, represents a reasonable approach in patients who are considered at high risk of relapse, although undergoing curative resection. In locally-advanced, unresectable or metastatic disease, chemotherapy alone is the treatment of reference. In recent years, systematic research has been made possible by optimising the treatment of advanced forms with improved survival and patients’ quality of life, mainly due to new combinations of the chemotherapy drugs. Gemcitabine, which for over a decade has been the only standard of care, and fluoropyrimidines have been joined by other drugs including oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and more recently nab-paclitaxel.
In case of jaundice, the placement of an internal biliary prosthesis by endoscopic route (by endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, ERCP), is a viable alternative to palliative surgery with success rates up to 85%, low risk of mortality (1-2%) and significant reduction in the duration of hospitalisation.
In gastro-resected patients or patients that for other reasons cannot undergo internal prosthetic, external biliary drainage placement could be considered.
Clinical trials currently underway at IEO for this type of cancer are investigating dressing the application of new biological drugs in the treatment of metastatic disease and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in potentially resectable disease. Finally, one area of absolute novelty is represented by the search for molecular markers both in sporadic and family-hereditary forms.